Research

Estimating population average treatment effects for food labelling policy: A causal inference modelling approach for generalising trial findings to target populations in non-nested designs.

Synthesis of empirical evidence

The collective evidence generated through this thesis demands a fundamental shift in how researchers and policymakers conceptualise the pathway from policy implementation to public health impact. Traditionally, front-of-package (FOP) labelling has been treated as a straightforward tool for informational disclosure, resting on the neoclassical assumption that providing consumers with comprehensive data will naturally lead to optimised dietary consumption.

However, by synthesising the findings from the empirical investigations conducted in this dissertation, a more complex and nuanced reality emerges. This thesis demonstrates that the limited effectiveness of current labelling policies is not a failure of consumer willpower, but rather a systemic oversight regarding the perceptual and cognitive constraints of human information processing.

Situated within this interdisciplinary landscape, this thesis investigates FOP labelling effectiveness by addressing both the empirical constraints of individual cognition and the methodological challenges of integrating data to estimate population-level impacts. The remainder of this thesis is structured across four subsequent chapters:

Each of the empirical chapters (Chapters 3, 4, and 5) is structured as a self-contained research paper, complete with specific introductions, methodologies, and conclusions. While the chapters can be read independently, the prescribed sequence reflects the methodological progression of the thesis: diagnosing behavioral constraints via observational data, identifying causal mechanisms experimentally, and utilizing generalizability frameworks to forecast national public health impact.

Experimental Visuals & Policy Models

combined_model
Effects of FOLP on participants’ ability to choose cereal brands according to calorie counts, in relation to their performance on the n-back test. See in Avalos, C. (2025). Food label granularity and working memory: Effects on food choice in a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 44, 375. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41043-025-01076-x
combined_nback_effects
Interaction effects between FOLP treatments and n-back test levels on participants’ ability to choose cereal brands according to calorie counts. The plots show the associations between d’ as n-back performance (1-back, 2-back, and 3-back) and participants’ calorie count estimates under different labelling conditions (black = no label, red = detailed label, blue = coarse label). The bands represent 95% confidence intervals. See in Avalos, C. (2025). Food label granularity and working memory: Effects on food choice in a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 44, 375. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41043-025-01076-x
readability_5x3_grid
Mean perceived MTL print size readability from 2012 to 2018, stratified by sociodemographic characteristics, behavioural characteristics, and food products. Higher scores denote enhanced readability. See in Avalos, C., Wang, Y., & Shryane, N. (2026). Food label readability and consumption frequency: Isolating content-specific effects via a non-equivalent dependent variable design. Nutrients, 18(2), 197. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/2/197
Trend_Plot_Absolute_BMI
Projected population mean BMI change over a 10-year horizon (2025–2035) under alternative FOP labelling policy scenarios. The Status Quo (Black line) represents the counterfactual baseline of natural weight gain (secular trend) in the absence of policy intervention. Coloured lines represent the mean projected trajectories for the Coarse Label (yellow), Coarse Label + Industry Reformulation (red), Detailed Label (light blue), and Detailed Label + Industry Reformulation (Blue) scenarios, based on Population Average Treatment Effect (PATE) estimates from Model A to F. Estimates under 0.3%, 0.5% and 0.7% dietary compensation assumptions. The projection incorporates a stochastic noise parameter to simulate natural year-to-year population variability and an implementation lag function assuming partial policy effect in years 1–2 before reaching steady state. Shaded ribbons indicate the 95% confidence intervals derived from the uncertainty in the transported treatment effect estimates. See in Avalos, C., Wang, Y., & Shryane, N. (in preparation). On the selection of covariates for transportability: A doubly robust machine learning approach for generalising a food labelling trial with mixed-type data.